linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform: move from strlcpy with unused retval to strscpy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9c6f4ac0-1e71-6b91-ae03-0795cd551c46@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2022 11:20:48 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
        Divya Bharathi <divya.bharathi@...l.com>,
        Prasanth Ksr <prasanth.ksr@...l.com>,
        Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com,
        Thinkpad-acpi devel ML <ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform: move from strlcpy with unused retval to strscpy

Hi,

On 8/19/22 11:19, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> I assume you are experimenting with coccinelle, so I have no objection
>> to the change, but in PDx86 we usually want to have one patch per
>> driver. Can you split?
> 
> I can split if you want.
> 
> I intentionally did group per subsystem, otherwise I would have sent out
> 1200+ patches. So, I chose to do it on subsystem level first and adapt
> later where this scheme does not fit.

See my reply to Andy, there is no need to split this further IMHO,
as you sat 1200 patches would be a bit much.

I will merge this as is during my next round of merges.

Regards,

Hans