[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0950172-aab0-a771-0255-d3654f217ce8@netscape.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:56:26 -0400
From: Chuck Zmudzinski <brchuckz@...scape.net>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alan Bartlett <ajb@...epo.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, ElRepo <contact@...epo.org>,
Akemi Yagi <toracat@...epo.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf scripts python: Let script to be python2 compliant
On 8/19/2022 2:48 AM, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 07:52:22AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > I see this has already been committed. I agree it should not
> > > > stay in the kernel tree for long. At some point in the future
> > > > it will most likely cause problems if it is not reverted.
> > >
>
>
> It's fine for me to revert this patch in an appropriate time.
An appropriate time presumably means when there is no more significant
demand for mainline kernel support on older distros like RHEL 7 and clones
that are still using python2. I also presume you plan to post the proposed
revert to the appropriate mailing lists before committing it, giving time for
anyone who wants to keep python2 compatibility a chance to make their
case.
Thanks,
Chuck
Powered by blists - more mailing lists