linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: sound: Add Apple MCA I2S transceiver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2022 16:14:08 +0200
From:   Martin Povišer <povik+lin@...ebit.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
        Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
        asahi@...ts.linux.dev, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: sound: Add Apple MCA I2S transceiver



> On 19. 8. 2022, at 15:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> On 19/08/2022 15:58, Martin Povišer wrote:
>> 
>>> On 19. 8. 2022, at 14:54, Martin Povišer <povik+lin@...ebit.org> wrote:


>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - enum:
>>> +          - apple,t8103-mca
>>> +          - apple,t6000-mca
>> 
>> Since it was brought up last time but I didn’t respond: the
>> nonalphabetical order is as the chips were introduced (and
>> matches other schemas).
> 
> Sure, just keep that order for future compatibles as well - so always
> put them according to verifiable time of market introduction...
> 
> This is very poor reason, instead of alphabetical order. Even worse
> reason is repeating wrong pattern just because someone else did it.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

I don’t see it nearly as clear-cut. Adding to the end seems pretty
foolproof too, but OK, next submission will have it alphabet. ordered.

Best,
Martin