[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1E87F09C-4904-49E2-B45C-C408DD5F6F62@linux.dev>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 15:33:04 +0800
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix pgdat->kswap accessed concurrently
> On Aug 20, 2022, at 11:25, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> The pgdat->kswap could be accessed concurrently by kswapd_run() and
> kcompactd(), it don't be protected by any lock, which leads to the
> following null-ptr-deref,
>
> vmscan: Failed to start kswapd on node 0
> ...
> BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in kcompactd+0x440/0x504
> Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000024 by task kcompactd0/37
>
> CPU: 0 PID: 37 Comm: kcompactd0 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE 5.10.60 #1
> Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
> Call trace:
> dump_backtrace+0x0/0x394
> show_stack+0x34/0x4c
> dump_stack+0x158/0x1e4
> __kasan_report+0x138/0x140
> kasan_report+0x44/0xdc
> __asan_load8+0x94/0xd0
> kcompactd+0x440/0x504
> kthread+0x1a4/0x1f0
> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>
> Fix it by adding READ_ONCE()|WRITE_ONCE().
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 4 +++-
> mm/vmscan.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 640fa76228dd..aa1cfe47f046 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -1983,7 +1983,9 @@ static inline bool is_via_compact_memory(int order)
>
> static bool kswapd_is_running(pg_data_t *pgdat)
> {
> - return pgdat->kswapd && task_is_running(pgdat->kswapd);
> + struct task_struct *t = READ_ONCE(pgdat->kswapd);
> +
> + return t && task_is_running(t);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index b2b1431352dc..9abba714249e 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -4642,16 +4642,19 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
> void kswapd_run(int nid)
> {
> pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> + struct task_struct *t;
>
> - if (pgdat->kswapd)
> + if (READ_ONCE(pgdat->kswapd))
> return;
>
> - pgdat->kswapd = kthread_run(kswapd, pgdat, "kswapd%d", nid);
> - if (IS_ERR(pgdat->kswapd)) {
> + t = kthread_run(kswapd, pgdat, "kswapd%d", nid);
> + if (IS_ERR(t)) {
> /* failure at boot is fatal */
> BUG_ON(system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING);
> pr_err("Failed to start kswapd on node %d\n", nid);
> - pgdat->kswapd = NULL;
> + WRITE_ONCE(pgdat->kswapd, NULL);
> + } else {
> + WRITE_ONCE(pgdat->kswapd, t);
> }
> }
IIUC, the race is like the followings:
CPU 0: CPU 1:
kswapd_run()
pgdat->kswapd = kthread_run()
if (IS_ERR(pgdat->kswapd))
kswapd_is_running
// load pgdat->kswapd and it is NOT NULL.
pgdat->kswapd = NULL
task_is_running(pgdat->kswapd); // NULL pointer dereference
So
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Thanks.
>
> @@ -4661,11 +4664,11 @@ void kswapd_run(int nid)
> */
> void kswapd_stop(int nid)
> {
> - struct task_struct *kswapd = NODE_DATA(nid)->kswapd;
> + struct task_struct *kswapd = READ_ONCE(NODE_DATA(nid)->kswapd);
>
> if (kswapd) {
> kthread_stop(kswapd);
> - NODE_DATA(nid)->kswapd = NULL;
> + WRITE_ONCE(NODE_DATA(nid)->kswapd, NULL);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.35.3
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists