[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <182bb035c23.6b1246ee44934.6791244868891887905@siddh.me>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 16:58:55 +0530
From: Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>
To: "Eric Biggers" <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel-mentees"
<linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] watch_queue: Clean up some code
On Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:40 +0530 Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> There is a dangling reference to pipe in a watch_queue after clearing it.
> Thus, NULL that pointer while clearing.
>
> This change renders wqueue->defunct superfluous, as the latter is only used
> to check if watch_queue is cleared. With this change, the pipe is NULLed
> while clearing, so we can just check if the pipe is NULL.
>
> Extending comment for watch_queue->pipe in the definition of watch_queue
> made the comment conventionally too long (it was already past 80 chars),
> so I have changed the struct annotations to be kerneldoc-styled, so that
> I can extend the comment mentioning that the pipe is NULL when watch_queue
> is cleared. In the process, I have also hopefully improved documentation
> by documenting things which weren't documented before.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Merged the NULLing and removing defunct patches.
> - Removed READ_ONCE barrier in lock_wqueue().
> - Improved and fixed errors in struct docs.
> - Better commit messages.
>
> Siddh Raman Pant (2):
> include/linux/watch_queue: Improve documentation
> kernel/watch_queue: NULL the dangling *pipe, and use it for clear
> check
>
> include/linux/watch_queue.h | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> kernel/watch_queue.c | 12 ++---
> 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.35.1
Hello,
Maybe the above quoted patch was missed due to the
then-ongoing merge window. This can be found on:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1659771577.git.code@siddh.me/
This patch was posted 2 weeks ago, with changes as requested.
With the merge window closed, may I request for another look at
this patch?
Thanks,
Siddh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists