[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220820091104.4dad095b@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 09:11:04 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@...il.com>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] tracing/eprobes: Have event probes be consistent
with kprobes and uprobes
On Sat, 20 Aug 2022 22:04:42 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > For "comm", if "comm" is used and the event being attached to does not
> > have the "comm" field, then make it the "$comm" that kprobes has. This is
> > consistent to the way histograms and filters work.
>
> Hmm, I think I would better allow user to use $COMM to get comm string
> for kprobe/uprobe event users too. (There are many special variables...)
> Anyway, this looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
I could add this on top of the patch series.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists