[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwErb9MnfTFCmOcA@ZenIV>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 19:43:59 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHES] termios.h cleanups
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 11:14:19AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 8:34 PM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > It takes the helpers and INIT_C_CC into new header (termios-internal.h),
> > with defaults being in linux/termios-internal.h, unless an arch-specific
> > variant is provided in asm/termios-internal.h (only alpha and sparc end
> > up needing that). Files that need that stuff (all 4 of them) include
> > linux/termios-internal.h.
>
> I don't see anything obviously wrong here, and my main reaction is
> actually that I wish this went a bit further, and moved the whole
> kernel_termios_to_user_termios stuff into C code rather than having
> them in headers.
>
> I don't think it's really worth inlining those things, and I wonder if
> we could just have the default "just copy directly to/from user space"
> as __weak functions, and then allow sparc and alpha to override them?
Umm... Might as well, I guess... Where to put those, though?
drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c is not an option, unfortunately - it'll pick
the local definitions, __weak or no __weak. drivers/tty/termios.c
just for those? Looks just as convoluted as having those as inlines...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists