linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] LoongArch/ftrace: Add basic support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAhV-H4hVhid1=aaP-fDtdvYyJ+yJqkKeznEN5a9zF9S-dHgog@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 20 Aug 2022 10:16:59 +0800
From:   Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To:     Qing Zhang <zhangqing@...ngson.cn>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] LoongArch/ftrace: Add basic support

Hi, all,

On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 9:34 AM Qing Zhang <zhangqing@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2022/8/20 上午12:53, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:29:29 +0800
> > Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> >
> >> It seems this patch adds non-dynamic ftrace, this code should not
> >> appear here.
> >> BTW is it really necessary for non-dynamic ftrace? I do not use it
> >> directly and frequently, IMHO, non-dynamic can be completely
> >>
> >> replaced dynamic?
> >
> > Note, I keep the non dynamic ftrace around for debugging purposes.
> >
> > But sure, it's pretty useless. It's also good for bringing ftrace to a new
> > architecture (like this patch is doing), as it is easier to implement than
> > dynamic ftrace, and getting the non-dynamic working is usually the first
> > step in getting dynamic ftrace working.
> >
> > But it's really up to the arch maintainers to keep it or not.
> >
> Before submitting, I saw that other architectures almost kept
> non-dynamic methods without cleaning up, I tend to keep them.
> How do you think, Huacai. :)
I prefer to keep the non-dynamic method.

Huacai
>
> Thanks,
> - Qing
> > -- Steve
> >
>
>