[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74218ad22f227bb62e7bc52397426545eb1c995d.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 11:27:23 +0300
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: remove unnecessary check on INIT intercept
On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 12:56 -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Since svm_check_nested_events() is now handling INIT signals, there is
> no need to latch it until the VMEXIT is injected. The only condition
> under which INIT signals are latched is GIF=0.
>
> Suggested-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 10 +---------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index f3813dbacb9f..26a348389ece 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -4697,15 +4697,7 @@ static bool svm_apic_init_signal_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>
> - /*
> - * TODO: Last condition latch INIT signals on vCPU when
> - * vCPU is in guest-mode and vmcb12 defines intercept on INIT.
> - * To properly emulate the INIT intercept,
> - * svm_check_nested_events() should call nested_svm_vmexit()
> - * if an INIT signal is pending.
> - */
> - return !gif_set(svm) ||
> - (vmcb_is_intercept(&svm->vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_INIT));
> + return !gif_set(svm);
> }
>
> static void svm_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 vector)
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
Powered by blists - more mailing lists