[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220821145940.277394-1-sander@svanheule.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 16:59:40 +0200
From: Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
Subject: [PATCH] kunit: fix assert_type for KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG()
When replacing KUNIT_BINARY_LE_MSG_ASSERTION() with
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION() for KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG(), the assert_type
parameter was changed from KUNIT_EXPECTATION to KUNIT_ASSERTION. This
causes KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() and KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG() to behave the
same way, and tests after a failed KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() are not run.
Call KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTIO() with KUNIT_EXPECTATION for again match
the documented behavior for KUNIT_EXPECT_* macros.
Fixes: 40f39777ce4f ("kunit: decrease macro layering for integer asserts")
Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
---
include/kunit/test.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index c958855681cc..617ec995671d 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ do { \
#define KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
- KUNIT_ASSERTION, \
+ KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \
left, <=, right, \
fmt, \
##__VA_ARGS__)
--
2.37.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists