linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 0/2] spi: stm32_qspi: use QSPI bus as 8 lines communication channel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2022 17:50:40 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>
Cc:     Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        christophe.kerello@...s.st.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 0/2] spi: stm32_qspi: use QSPI bus as 8 lines
 communication channel

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 06:21:16PM +0200, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
> Hi Mark
> 
> I just noticed that the cleanup() callback is useless as the gpiod is 
> automatically freed by devm.
> 
> As you haven't send your pull request, do you accept a fixup patch you will squash 
> with patch [2/2] "spi: stm32_qspi: Add transfer_one_message() spi callback"
> or standalone patch ?

Normally you should just send an incremental patch but since it was the
top commit of the branch and I only just pushed it I've dropped this
commit (b051161f44d414e736fa2b011245441bae9babd7) so you can resend
with the fix squashed in if you want.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)