linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: lan966x-otpc: document Lan966X OTPC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220822181701.GA89665-robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:17:01 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: lan966x-otpc: document Lan966X OTPC

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 08:04:56AM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The 08/19/2022 09:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> > 
> > On 18/08/2022 19:44, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > > Document Lan966x OTP controller.
> > >
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    items:
> > > +      - const: microchip,lan966x-otpc
> > 
> > No wildcards in compatible (which will also affect the file name as it
> > should match the compatible).
> 
> Ok, I will replace lan966x with lan966 as the SoC is defined (SOC_LAN966)

Pretty sure that's still a wildcard for the SoC family. 9668 or 9662 are 
the ones we already have. Yes, there's already a bunch of 966x 
compatibles, but that's not a pattern that should continue.

Rob