linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 03/17] dt-bindings: spi: cdns: Add compatible for AMD Pensando Elba SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f5561edc-f2fc-05c6-8f24-e0b362989302@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2022 21:22:29 +0300
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Brad Larson <brad@...sando.io>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        adrian.hunter@...el.com, alcooperx@...il.com,
        andy.shevchenko@...il.com, arnd@...db.de, blarson@....com,
        brijeshkumar.singh@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        gsomlo@...il.com, gerg@...ux-m68k.org, krzk@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
        broonie@...nel.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
        p.zabel@...gutronix.de, piotrs@...ence.com, p.yadav@...com,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, samuel@...lland.org,
        fancer.lancer@...il.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org, will@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/17] dt-bindings: spi: cdns: Add compatible for AMD
 Pensando Elba SoC

On 20/08/2022 22:57, Brad Larson wrote:
> From: Brad Larson <blarson@....com>
> 
> Document the cadence qspi controller compatible for AMD Pensando
> Elba SoC boards.  The Elba qspi fifo size is 1024.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brad Larson <blarson@....com>

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.



Best regards,
Krzysztof