linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: fsl-spi: Implement trailing bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YwPZF6fjZkn2tozH@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2022 20:29:27 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: fsl-spi: Implement trailing bits

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 06:38:22PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 22/08/2022 à 19:15, Mark Brown a écrit :

> I think we already addressed this possibility back in 2016, see 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/20160824111206.GD22076@sirena.org.uk/

> The conclusion was that it was not possible to accomplish it with cs_change.

> Or did we miss something at that time ?

No, I think that's fine - your proposal has some overlap but is fine.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)