lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:49:20 +0000
From:   "Alice Guo (OSS)" <alice.guo@....nxp.com>
To:     Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
CC:     "wim@...ux-watchdog.org" <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/7] watchdog: imx7ulp: Add explict memory barrier for
 unlock sequence

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 2:24 PM
> To: Alice Guo (OSS) <alice.guo@....nxp.com>
> Cc: wim@...ux-watchdog.org; linux@...ck-us.net; shawnguo@...nel.org;
> s.hauer@...gutronix.de; festevam@...il.com;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>; kernel@...gutronix.de;
> linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] watchdog: imx7ulp: Add explict memory barrier for
> unlock sequence
> 
> On 22-08-16, Alice Guo (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>
> >
> > Add explict memory barrier for the wdog unlock sequence.
> 
> Did you inspected any failures? It's not enough to say what you did, you need
> to specify the why as well.
> 
> Regards,
>   Marco

Hi,

Two 16-bit writes of unlocking the Watchdog should be completed within a certain time. The first mb() is used to ensure that previous instructions are completed.
The second mb() is used to ensure that the unlock sequence cannot be affected by subsequent instructions. The reason will be added in the commit log of v2.

Best Regards,
Alice Guo

> 
> >
> > Suggested-by: Ye Li <ye.li@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alice Guo <alice.guo@....com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ye Li <ye.li@....com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c
> > b/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c index 014f497ea0dc..b8ac0cb04d2f
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c
> > @@ -179,9 +179,13 @@ static int imx7ulp_wdt_init(void __iomem *base,
> unsigned int timeout)
> >  	int ret;
> >
> >  	local_irq_disable();
> > +
> > +	mb();
> >  	/* unlock the wdog for reconfiguration */
> >  	writel_relaxed(UNLOCK_SEQ0, base + WDOG_CNT);
> >  	writel_relaxed(UNLOCK_SEQ1, base + WDOG_CNT);
> > +	mb();
> > +
> >  	ret = imx7ulp_wdt_wait(base, WDOG_CS_ULK);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		goto init_out;
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> >
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ