[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2ea61ad-3ff3-2ba7-3426-834b87fe85a3@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:32:28 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] x86/mtrr: fix MTRR fixup on APs
On 22.08.22 10:28, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 07:17:40AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> And then there is mtrr_state_warn() in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c
>> which has a comment saying:
>>
>> /* Some BIOS's are messed up and don't set all MTRRs the same! */
>
> That thing also says:
>
> pr_info("mtrr: probably your BIOS does not setup all CPUs.\n");
> pr_info("mtrr: corrected configuration.\n");
>
> because it'll go and force on all CPUs the MTRR state it read from the
> BSP in mtrr_bp_init->get_mtrr_state.
>
>> Yes, the chances are slim to hit such a box,
>
> Well, my workstation says:
>
> $ dmesg | grep -i mtrr
> [ 0.391514] mtrr: your CPUs had inconsistent variable MTRR settings
> [ 0.395199] mtrr: probably your BIOS does not setup all CPUs.
> [ 0.399199] mtrr: corrected configuration.
>
> but that's the variable MTRRs.
>
>> but your reasoning suggests I should remove the related code?
>
> My reasoning says you should not do anything at all here - works as
> advertized. :-)
>
And what about the:
pr_warn("mtrr: your CPUs had inconsistent MTRRdefType settings\n");
This is the case the patch would fix.
Juergen
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3099 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists