| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <DM4PR11MB531021EF2652531F037D21BBEE719@DM4PR11MB5310.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 08:47:18 +0000
From: "Zhang, Weihong" <weihong.zhang@...el.com>
To: "Hu, Robert" <robert.hu@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Taras Madan <tarasmadan@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Zhang, Weihong" <weihong.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv6 09/11] selftests/x86/lam: Add mmap and SYSCALL test
cases for linear-address masking
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hu, Robert <robert.hu@...el.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 4:15 PM
> To: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>; Dave Hansen
> <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>; Lutomirski, Andy <luto@...nel.org>; Peter
> Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: x86@...nel.org; Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>; Andrey Ryabinin
> <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>; Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>;
> Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>; Taras Madan
> <tarasmadan@...gle.com>; Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>; H . J .
> Lu <hjl.tools@...il.com>; Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>; Edgecombe,
> Rick P <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>; linux-mm@...ck.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Zhang, Weihong <weihong.zhang@...el.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCHv6 09/11] selftests/x86/lam: Add mmap and SYSCALL test
> cases for linear-address masking
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2022 12:18
> > To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>; Lutomirski, Andy
> > <luto@...nel.org>; Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Cc: x86@...nel.org; Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>; Andrey
> > Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>; Andrey Konovalov
> > <andreyknvl@...il.com>; Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>;
> Taras
> > Madan <tarasmadan@...gle.com>; Dmitry Vyukov
> <dvyukov@...gle.com>; H .
> > J . Lu <hjl.tools@...il.com>; Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>;
> > Edgecombe, Rick P <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>; linux-mm@...ck.org;
> > linux- kernel@...r.kernel.org; Zhang, Weihong
> <weihong.zhang@...el.com>; Kirill A .
> > Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCHv6 09/11] selftests/x86/lam: Add mmap and SYSCALL test
> > cases for linear-address masking
> >
> > From: Weihong Zhang <weihong.zhang@...el.com>
> >
> > Add mmap and SYSCALL test cases.
> >
> > SYSCALL test cases:
> >
> > - LAM supports set metadata in high bits 62:57 (LAM_U57) of a user
> > pointer, pass
> > the pointer to SYSCALL, SYSCALL can dereference the pointer and
> > return correct
> > result.
> >
> > - Disable LAM, pass a pointer with metadata in high bits to SYSCALL,
> > SYSCALL returns -1 (EFAULT).
> >
> > MMAP test cases:
> >
> > - Enable LAM_U57, MMAP with low address (below bits 47), set metadata
> > in high bits of the address, dereference the address should be
> > allowed.
> >
> > - Enable LAM_U57, MMAP with high address (above bits 47), set metadata
> > in high bits of the address, dereference the address should be
> > allowed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Weihong Zhang <weihong.zhang@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c | 135
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
> > index 4c6c6dbf7db6..e9e92ab7fea8 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > #include <signal.h>
> > #include <setjmp.h>
> > #include <sys/mman.h>
> > +#include <sys/utsname.h>
> > #include <sys/wait.h>
> > #include <inttypes.h>
> >
> > @@ -27,11 +28,18 @@
> > /* Specified test function bits */
> > #define FUNC_MALLOC 0x1
> > #define FUNC_BITS 0x2
> > +#define FUNC_MMAP 0x4
> > +#define FUNC_SYSCALL 0x8
> >
> > -#define TEST_MASK 0x3
> > +#define TEST_MASK 0xf
> > +
> > +#define LOW_ADDR (0x1UL << 30)
> > +#define HIGH_ADDR (0x3UL << 48)
> >
> > #define MALLOC_LEN 32
> >
> > +#define PAGE_SIZE (4 << 10)
> > +
> > struct testcases {
> > unsigned int later;
> > int expected; /* 2: SIGSEGV Error; 1: other errors */ @@ -47,6 +55,7
> > @@ jmp_buf segv_env; static void segv_handler(int sig) {
> > ksft_print_msg("Get segmentation fault(%d).", sig);
> > +
> > siglongjmp(segv_env, 1);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -59,6 +68,16 @@ static inline int cpu_has_lam(void)
> > return (cpuinfo[0] & (1 << 26));
> > }
> >
> > +/* Check 5-level page table feature in CPUID.(EAX=07H,
> > +ECX=00H):ECX.[bit 16] */ static inline int cpu_has_la57(void) {
> > + unsigned int cpuinfo[4];
> > +
> > + __cpuid_count(0x7, 0, cpuinfo[0], cpuinfo[1], cpuinfo[2],
> > +cpuinfo[3]);
> > +
> > + return (cpuinfo[2] & (1 << 16));
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Set tagged address and read back untag mask.
> > * check if the untagged mask is expected.
> > @@ -204,6 +223,68 @@ static int handle_malloc(struct testcases *test)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static int handle_mmap(struct testcases *test) {
> > + void *ptr;
> > + unsigned int flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS |
> MAP_FIXED;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (test->later == 0 && test->lam != 0)
> > + if (set_lam(test->lam) != 0)
> > + return 1;
> > +
> > + ptr = mmap((void *)test->addr, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ |
> > PROT_WRITE,
> > + flags, -1, 0);
> > + if (ptr == MAP_FAILED) {
> > + if (test->addr == HIGH_ADDR)
> > + if (!cpu_has_la57())
> > + return 3; /* unsupport LA57 */
> > + return 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (test->later != 0 && test->lam != 0)
> > + if (set_lam(test->lam) != 0)
> > + ret = 1;
> > +
> > + if (ret == 0) {
> > + if (sigsetjmp(segv_env, 1) == 0) {
> > + signal(SIGSEGV, segv_handler);
> > + ret = handle_lam_test(ptr, test->lam);
> > + } else {
> > + ret = 2;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + munmap(ptr, PAGE_SIZE);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int handle_syscall(struct testcases *test) {
> > + struct utsname unme, *pu;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (test->later == 0 && test->lam != 0)
> > + if (set_lam(test->lam) != 0)
> > + return 1;
> > +
> > + if (sigsetjmp(segv_env, 1) == 0) {
> > + signal(SIGSEGV, segv_handler);
> > + pu = (struct utsname *)get_metadata((uint64_t)&unme,
> test-
> > >lam);
> > + ret = uname(pu);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + ret = 1;
> > + } else {
> > + ret = 2;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (test->later != 0 && test->lam != 0)
> > + if (set_lam(test->lam) != -1 && ret == 0)
> > + ret = 1;
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int fork_test(struct testcases *test) {
> > int ret, child_ret;
> > @@ -259,7 +340,6 @@ static struct testcases malloc_cases[] = {
> > },
> > };
> >
> > -
> > static struct testcases bits_cases[] = {
> > {
> > .test_func = handle_max_bits,
> > @@ -267,11 +347,54 @@ static struct testcases bits_cases[] = {
> > },
> > };
> >
> > +static struct testcases syscall_cases[] = {
> > + {
> > + .later = 0,
> > + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS,
> > + .test_func = handle_syscall,
> > + .msg = "SYSCALL: LAM_U57. syscall with metadata\n",
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .later = 1,
> > + .expected = 1,
> > + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS,
> > + .test_func = handle_syscall,
> > + .msg = "SYSCALL:[Negtive] Disable LAM. Dereferencing
> pointer
> [Hu, Robert]
> Trivial, Negtive --> Negative.
>
Thanks, will fix the typo.
> > with metadata.\n",
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct testcases mmap_cases[] = {
> [Hu, Robert]
> Can mmap also have negative case?
>
Mmap just get a pointer. under U57 mode, negative case for mmap can refer to malloc cases.
> > + {
> > + .later = 1,
> > + .expected = 0,
> > + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS,
> > + .addr = HIGH_ADDR,
> > + .test_func = handle_mmap,
> > + .msg = "MMAP: First mmap high address, then set
> > LAM_U57.\n",
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .later = 0,
> > + .expected = 0,
> > + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS,
> > + .addr = HIGH_ADDR,
> > + .test_func = handle_mmap,
> > + .msg = "MMAP: First LAM_U57, then High address.\n",
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .later = 0,
> > + .expected = 0,
> > + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS,
> > + .addr = LOW_ADDR,
> > + .test_func = handle_mmap,
> > + .msg = "MMAP: First LAM_U57, then Low address.\n",
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > static void cmd_help(void)
> > {
> > printf("usage: lam [-h] [-t test list]\n");
> > printf("\t-t test list: run tests specified in the test list,
> > default:0x%x\n", TEST_MASK);
> > - printf("\t\t0x1:malloc; 0x2:max_bits;\n");
> > + printf("\t\t0x1:malloc; 0x2:max_bits; 0x4:mmap; 0x8:syscall.\n");
> > printf("\t-h: help\n");
> > }
> >
> > @@ -311,6 +434,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > if (tests & FUNC_BITS)
> > run_test(bits_cases, ARRAY_SIZE(bits_cases));
> >
> > + if (tests & FUNC_MMAP)
> > + run_test(mmap_cases, ARRAY_SIZE(mmap_cases));
> > +
> > + if (tests & FUNC_SYSCALL)
> > + run_test(syscall_cases, ARRAY_SIZE(syscall_cases));
> > +
> > ksft_set_plan(tests_cnt);
> >
> > return ksft_exit_pass();
> > --
> > 2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists