[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac6eacdf-81ad-42ec-3f3e-2db4c5ef76cf@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:05:28 +0000
From: <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To: <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, <mail@...chuod.ie>
CC: <monstr@...str.eu>, <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
<palmer@...belt.com>, <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
<gor@...ux.ibm.com>, <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
<borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>, <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
<ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>, <dalias@...c.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<bp@...en8.de>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<hpa@...or.com>, <arnd@...db.de>, <keescook@...omium.org>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>, <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add an asm-generic cpuinfo_op declaration
On 22/08/2022 10:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 1:36 PM Conor Dooley <mail@...chuod.ie> wrote:
>> arch/microblaze/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
>> arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 1 +
>> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
>> arch/sh/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
>> arch/sparc/include/asm/cpudata.h | 3 +--
>> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
>> include/asm-generic/processor.h | 7 +++++++
>> 7 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/processor.h
>
> I was a bit surprised not to find fs/proc/cpuinfo.c in the diffstat
> above. That file already has an external declaration for cpuinfo_op,
> and uses it rather unconditionally (that is, if CONFIG_PROC_FS=y)
> on all architectures.
>
> So I think you can just move that to include/linux/processor.h, include
> the latter everywhere, and drop all architecture-specific copies.
Hey Geert,
This is the sort of thing I was really hoping to hear, so fine by
me.. When you say "everywhere", I assume you mean in every arch
and not just the ones listed here that already have it in an arch
specific header?
Thanks,
Conor.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists