[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6EDC1D4B-4B84-49A2-A60A-EA15D27251A7@cutebit.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 15:11:48 +0200
From: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@...ebit.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: Export new 'graph.dot' file in debugfs
> On 22. 8. 2022, at 15:04, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 02:38:09PM +0200, Martin Povišer wrote:
>>> On 22. 8. 2022, at 14:27, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>>> There was a tool floating about in the past (last copy I knew about was
>>> on Wolfson's git but they took that down) - can we not just continue to
>>> do that?
>
>> I don’t know the tool or where would I find it. I think it’s neat
>
> Copying in Charles and Richard who might know about the status of the
> tool Dimitris wrote.
Thanks.
>> simply having a ‘graph.dot’ at hand, especially since it requires
>> little code. (Although sure there’s the danger of it growing.)
>
> I'm also worried about people going in and wanting other more tool
> specific formats adding, if we didn't have anything at all it'd be one
> thing but we do have something.
Sure, although I would argue DOT is by a large margin the standard
format to represent graphs in.
Best,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists