[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSw0zJWQEm-GCzQy_-4-X-yVuzvX1wBFcYMkG1mOXy+BA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:34:15 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@...wei.com>, eparis@...hat.com,
mszeredi@...hat.com, amir73il@...il.com, linux-audit@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] audit: fix potential double free on error path from fsnotify_add_inode_mark
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 4:50 AM Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Mon 22-08-22 10:29:05, Gaosheng Cui wrote:
> > Audit_alloc_mark() assign pathname to audit_mark->path, on error path
> > from fsnotify_add_inode_mark(), fsnotify_put_mark will free memory
> > of audit_mark->path, but the caller of audit_alloc_mark will free
> > the pathname again, so there will be double free problem.
> >
> > Fix this by resetting audit_mark->path to NULL pointer on error path
> > from fsnotify_add_inode_mark().
> >
> > Fixes: 7b1293234084d ("fsnotify: Add group pointer in fsnotify_init_mark()")
> > Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@...wei.com>
>
> Good spotting! The patch looks good to me. Feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>
> > ---
> > kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c b/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> > index 6432a37ac1c9..c565fbf66ac8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> > +++ b/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> > @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pa
> >
> > ret = fsnotify_add_inode_mark(&audit_mark->mark, inode, 0);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > + audit_mark->path = NULL;
> > fsnotify_put_mark(&audit_mark->mark);
As I'm tracing the code path from audit through fsnotify, and back
into audit, I'm wondering if we still have a problem. When
fsnotify_add_inode_mark() fails it will end up freeing not just
audit_mark->path, but audit_mark itself via audit_fsnotify_mark_free()
(via a call into fsnotify_put_mark()), yes? If that is the case, I
think the better fix would simply be to just remove the
fsnotify_put_mark() call and add a small comment in this error patch
mentioning that fsnotify_put_mark() will release audit_mark on error.
Thoughts?
> > audit_mark = ERR_PTR(ret);
> > }
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists