[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a271d041-08fa-c2db-f2ac-d64d9b119797@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 22:43:09 +0800
From: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <arnd@...db.de>, <ardb@...nel.org>,
<rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<nick.hawkins@....com>, <john@...ozen.org>, <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: Recover kretprobes return address for EABI
stack unwinder
On 2022/8/22 19:20, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 1:06 PM Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> 'fed240d9c974 ("ARM: Recover kretprobe modified return address in stacktrace")'
>> has implemented kretprobes return address recovery for FP
>> unwinder, this patch makes it works for EABI unwinder.
>>
>> It saves __kretprobe_trampoline address in LR on stack to identify
>> and recover the correct return address in EABI unwinder.
>>
>> Since EABI doesn't use r11 as frame pointer, we need to use SP to
>> identify different kretprobes addresses. Here the value of SP has fixed
>> distance to conventional FP position so it's fine to use it.
>>
>> Passed kunit kprobes_test on QEMU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
> This looks correct to me FWIW I understand the assembly
> but I'm vaguely unfamiliar with the kprobe API, but anyway:
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> Would you please drop it into Russell's patch tracker?
Done for it.
Thanks for review!
Best,
Chen
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists