linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests: fix a couple missing .gitignore entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJHvVcgfdkrQSsoenyanjtuav9OK4w9YKVqinUiMrkvdgtB4sg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2022 09:17:57 -0700
From:   Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linuxkselftest <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: fix a couple missing .gitignore entries

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 4:07 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:05:58 -0700 Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> > Some recent commits added new test binaries, but forgot to add those to
> > .gitignore. Now, after one does "make -C tools/testing/selftests", one
> > ends up with some untracked files in the kernel tree.
> >
> > Add the test binaries to .gitignore, to avoid this minor annoyance.
> >
> > Fixes: d8b6171bd58a ("selftests/io_uring: test zerocopy send")
> > Fixes: 6342140db660 ("selftests/timens: add a test for vfork+exit")
> > Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore    | 3 ++-
> >  tools/testing/selftests/timens/.gitignore | 1 +
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore
> > index 0e5751af6247..02abf8fdfd3a 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore
> > @@ -39,4 +39,5 @@ toeplitz
> >  tun
> >  cmsg_sender
> >  unix_connect
> > -tap
> > \ No newline at end of file
> > +tap
> > +io_uring_zerocopy_tx
>
> Could you make the io_uring test the first in the file?
> That'd gets us closest to the alphabetical ordering (I know the file is
> not ordered now, but we should start moving that way).

It isn't that it's mostly ordered with a few exceptions, to me it
looks entirely random. I don't mind moving the one I'm adding but, I'm
not sure it gives much value given that.

Would folks object to just adding a second commit to this which sorts
the file? Since this file isn't changed frequently, I would say the
risk of annoying conflicts is pretty low.