linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: Modify gamma compatible for mt8195

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 11:40:18 +0300
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     "zheng-yan.chen" <zheng-yan.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "Jason-JH . Lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Singo Chang <singo.chang@...iatek.com>,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: Modify gamma compatible for mt8195

On 22/08/2022 12:19, zheng-yan.chen wrote:
> Modify gamma compatible for mt8195.
> 
> Signed-off-by: zheng-yan.chen <zheng-yan.chen@...iatek.com>
> 
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
> index a50ebb5d145f..8504d01b103a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
> @@ -2021,8 +2021,8 @@
>  			mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c00XXXX 0x5000 0x1000>;
>  		};
>  
> -		gamma0: gamma@...06000 {
> -			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-disp-gamma", "mediatek,mt8183-disp-gamma";
> +		gamma0: disp_gamma@...06000 {

No, really, no.

Not explained in commit msg, violates naming convention, violates coding
style, not related to the patch at all.

Best regards,
Krzysztof