linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] KVM: arm64: Enable ring-based dirty memory tracking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cc062eeb-0a13-3cf4-7ce7-f4f0b1caaf97@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 13:19:15 +1000
From:   Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        corbet@....net, james.morse@....com, alexandru.elisei@....com,
        suzuki.poulose@....com, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        seanjc@...gle.com, drjones@...hat.com, dmatlack@...gle.com,
        bgardon@...gle.com, ricarkol@...gle.com, zhenyzha@...hat.com,
        shan.gavin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] KVM: arm64: Enable ring-based dirty memory
 tracking

Hi Peter,

On 8/23/22 4:55 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:58:20AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> For context, the documentation says:
>>>
>>> <quote>
>>> - if KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING is available, a number of pages at
>>>     KVM_DIRTY_LOG_PAGE_OFFSET * PAGE_SIZE. [...]
>>> </quote>
>>>
>>> What is the reason for picking this particular value?
>>>
>>
>> It's inherited from x86. I don't think it has to be this particular value.
>> The value is used to distinguish the region's owners like kvm_run, KVM_PIO_PAGE_OFFSET,
>> KVM_COALESCED_MMIO_PAGE_OFFSET, and KVM_DIRTY_LOG_PAGE_OFFSET.
>>
>> How about to have 2 for KVM_DIRTY_LOG_PAGE_OFFSET in next revision?
>> The virtual area is cheap, I guess it's also nice to use x86's
>> pattern to have 64 for KVM_DIRTY_LOG_PAGE_OFFSET.
>>
>>      #define KVM_COALESCED_MMIO_PAGE_OFFSET   1
>>      #define KVM_DIRTY_LOG_PAGE_OFFSET        2
> 
> It was chosen not to be continuous of previous used offset because it'll be
> the 1st vcpu region that can cover multiple & dynamic number of pages.  I
> wanted to leave the 3-63 (x86 used offset 2 already) for small fields so
> they can be continuous, which looks a little bit cleaner.
> 
> Currently how many pages it'll use depends on the size set by the user,
> though there's a max size limited by KVM_DIRTY_RING_MAX_ENTRIES, which is a
> maximum of 1MB memory.
> 
> So I think setting it to 2 is okay, as long as we keep the rest 1MB address
> space for the per-vcpu ring structure, so any new vcpu fields (even if only
> 1 page will be needed) need to be after that maximum size of the ring.
> 

Thanks for the details. I think it'd keep the layout since virtual area
is really cheap. So lets keep it as of being if Marc doesn't object. In
this way, the new area, which is usually one page size can go after
KVM_COALESCED_MMIO_PAGE_OFFSET.

#define KVM_DIRTY_LOG_PAGE_OFFSET 64

Thanks,
Gavin