[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220823080046.680873844@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 10:25:47 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 015/158] apparmor: Fix failed mount permission check error message
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
commit ec240b5905bbb09a03dccffee03062cf39e38dc2 upstream.
When the mount check fails due to a permission check failure instead
of explicitly at one of the subcomponent checks, AppArmor is reporting
a failure in the flags match. However this is not true and AppArmor
can not attribute the error at this point to any particular component,
and should only indicate the mount failed due to missing permissions.
Fixes: 2ea3ffb7782a ("apparmor: add mount mediation")
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
security/apparmor/mount.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/security/apparmor/mount.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/mount.c
@@ -229,7 +229,8 @@ static const char * const mnt_info_table
"failed srcname match",
"failed type match",
"failed flags match",
- "failed data match"
+ "failed data match",
+ "failed perms check"
};
/*
@@ -284,8 +285,8 @@ static int do_match_mnt(struct aa_dfa *d
return 0;
}
- /* failed at end of flags match */
- return 4;
+ /* failed at perms check, don't confuse with flags match */
+ return 6;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists