lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220823080051.338255374@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 10:27:48 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 136/158] modules: Ensure natural alignment for .altinstructions and __bug_table sections

From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>

[ Upstream commit 87c482bdfa79f378297d92af49cdf265be199df5 ]

In the kernel image vmlinux.lds.S linker scripts the .altinstructions
and __bug_table sections are 4- or 8-byte aligned because they hold 32-
and/or 64-bit values.

Most architectures use altinstructions and BUG() or WARN() in modules as
well, but in the module linker script (module.lds.S) those sections are
currently missing. As consequence the linker will store their content
byte-aligned by default, which then can lead to unnecessary unaligned
memory accesses by the CPU when those tables are processed at runtime.

Usually unaligned memory accesses are unnoticed, because either the
hardware (as on x86 CPUs) or in-kernel exception handlers (e.g. on
parisc or sparc) emulate and fix them up at runtime. Nevertheless, such
unaligned accesses introduce a performance penalty and can even crash
the kernel if there is a bug in the unalignment exception handlers
(which happened once to me on the parisc architecture and which is why I
noticed that issue at all).

This patch fixes a non-critical issue and might be backported at any time.
It's trivial and shouldn't introduce any regression because it simply
tells the linker to use a different (8-byte alignment) for those
sections by default.

Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yr8%2Fgr8e8I7tVX4d@p100/
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 scripts/module.lds.S | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/module.lds.S b/scripts/module.lds.S
index c5f12195817b..2c510db6c2ed 100644
--- a/scripts/module.lds.S
+++ b/scripts/module.lds.S
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ SECTIONS {
 
 	.init_array		0 : ALIGN(8) { *(SORT(.init_array.*)) *(.init_array) }
 
+	.altinstructions	0 : ALIGN(8) { KEEP(*(.altinstructions)) }
+	__bug_table		0 : ALIGN(8) { KEEP(*(__bug_table)) }
 	__jump_table		0 : ALIGN(8) { KEEP(*(__jump_table)) }
 
 	__patchable_function_entries : { *(__patchable_function_entries) }
-- 
2.35.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ