linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] thunderbolt: thunderbolt: add nvm specific operations for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YwSiEx87AuVL/QK4@black.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:46:59 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Szuying Chen <chensiying21@...il.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mario.limonciello@....com,
        andreas.noever@...il.com, michael.jamet@...el.com,
        YehezkelShB@...il.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yd_Tseng@...edia.com.tw,
        Chloe_Chen@...edia.com.tw, Richard_Hsu@...edia.com.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] thunderbolt: thunderbolt: add nvm specific
 operations for

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 05:04:23PM +0800, Szuying Chen wrote:
> From: Szuying Chen <Chloe_Chen@...edia.com.tw>
> 
> The patch depends on patch 1/2. Add nvm specific operations for ASMedia.
> And add tb_switch_nvm_upgradable() of enable firmware upgrade.

Again the $subject and please call it NVM (capital letters) everywhere.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Szuying Chen <Chloe_Chen@...edia.com.tw>
> ---
>  drivers/thunderbolt/nvm.c    | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c |  3 +++
>  drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h     |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/nvm.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/nvm.c
> index 5c7c2a284497..d2ef22f8b19b 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/nvm.c
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/nvm.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
>  /* Switch NVM support */
>  #define NVM_CSS		0x10
> 
> +/* ASMedia specific NVM offsets */
> +#define ASMEDIA_NVM_VERSION	0x1c
> +
>  static DEFINE_IDA(nvm_ida);
> 
>  static inline int nvm_read(struct tb_switch *sw, unsigned int address,
> @@ -116,11 +119,39 @@ static int intel_nvm_validate(struct tb_switch *sw)
>  	return image_size;
>  }
> 
> +static int asmedia_nvm_version(struct tb_switch *sw)
> +{
> +	struct tb_nvm *nvm = sw->nvm;
> +	u64 val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = nvm_read(sw, ASMEDIA_NVM_VERSION, &val, sizeof(val));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* ASMedia NVM version show format include Firmware version and date xxxxxx.xxxxxx */
> +	nvm->major = (((u8)val >> 0x18) << 0x10 | ((u8)(val >> 0x20)) << 0x8 | (u8)(val >> 0x28));
> +	nvm->minor = (((u8)val) << 0x10 | ((u8)(val >> 0x8)) << 0x8 | (u8)(val >> 0x10));

Can you use some helperes to make this look nicer?

> +	nvm->nvm_size = SZ_512K;

Some explanation perhaps why 512K? Is it always the case even for the
future NVMs? Can it be read somewhere?

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void tb_switch_set_nvm_upgrade(struct tb_switch *sw)
> +{
> +	sw->no_nvm_upgrade = false;
> +}
> +
>  struct tb_nvm_vendor_ops intel_switch_nvm_ops = {
>  	.version = intel_nvm_version,
>  	.validate = intel_nvm_validate,
>  };
> 
> +struct tb_nvm_vendor_ops asmedia_switch_nvm_ops = {

const

> +	.nvm_upgrade = tb_switch_set_nvm_upgrade,
> +	.version = asmedia_nvm_version,
> +};
> +
>  struct switch_nvm_vendor {
>  	u16 vendor;
>  	const struct tb_nvm_vendor_ops *vops;
> @@ -129,8 +160,23 @@ struct switch_nvm_vendor {
>  static const struct switch_nvm_vendor switch_nvm_vendors[] = {
>  	{ 0x8086, &intel_switch_nvm_ops },
>  	{ 0x8087, &intel_switch_nvm_ops },
> +	{ 0x174c, &asmedia_switch_nvm_ops },

Ordering, I commented this already last time :(

>  };
> 

If you export it outside of this file, please write kernel-doc.

> +void tb_switch_nvm_upgradable(struct tb_switch *sw)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(switch_nvm_vendors); i++) {
> +		const struct switch_nvm_vendor *v = &switch_nvm_vendors[i];
> +
> +		if (v->vendor == sw->config.vendor_id) {
> +			if (v->vops->nvm_upgrade)
> +				v->vops->nvm_upgrade(sw);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * tb_switch_nvm_alloc() - alloc nvm and set nvm->vops to point
>   * the vendor specific operations.
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c
> index d257219cb66e..23df70290ca2 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c
> @@ -2829,6 +2829,9 @@ int tb_switch_add(struct tb_switch *sw)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> 
> +	/* Enable the NVM firmware upgrade for specific vendors */
> +	tb_switch_nvm_upgradable(sw);
> +
>  	ret = device_add(&sw->dev);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&sw->dev, "failed to add device: %d\n", ret);
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h
> index 73ae2e093a92..8e2887e9c669 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ enum tb_nvm_write_ops {
>  struct tb_nvm_vendor_ops {
>  	int (*version)(struct tb_switch *sw);
>  	int (*validate)(struct tb_switch *sw);
> +	void (*nvm_upgrade)(struct tb_switch *sw);

Kernel-doc for this too, well and the rest.

>  };
> 
>  #define TB_SWITCH_KEY_SIZE		32
> @@ -748,6 +749,7 @@ static inline void tb_domain_put(struct tb *tb)
>  	put_device(&tb->dev);
>  }
> 
> +void tb_switch_nvm_upgradable(struct tb_switch *sw);

Same comment about the location. Also is it "upgradeable"? 

>  struct tb_nvm *tb_switch_nvm_alloc(struct tb_switch *sw);
>  struct tb_nvm *tb_nvm_alloc(struct device *dev);
>  int tb_nvm_add_active(struct tb_nvm *nvm, size_t size, nvmem_reg_read_t reg_read);
> --
> 2.34.1