| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gKvMmu2YR+2oEFK759-_ga-4uJm8KQ47r5EehqGC=yvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 14:12:51 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Riwen Lu <luriwen@...mail.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>,
Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@...edance.com>,
Riwen Lu <luriwen@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: Bug: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI: Split out processor thermal register
from ACPI PSS
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 3:16 AM Riwen Lu <luriwen@...mail.com> wrote:
>
> 在 2022/8/22 20:25, Rafael J. Wysocki 写道:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:19 AM Riwen Lu <luriwen@...mail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> 在 2022/8/19 04:23, Jeremy Linton 写道:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 6/16/22 21:51, Riwen Lu wrote:
> >>>> From: Riwen Lu <luriwen@...inos.cn>
> >>>>
> >>>> Commit 239708a3af44 ("ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor
> >>>> driver"), moves processor thermal registration to acpi_pss_perf_init(),
> >>>> which doesn't get executed if ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS is not enabled.
> >>>>
> >>>> As ARM64 supports P-states using CPPC, it should be possible to also
> >>>> support processor passive cooling even if PSS is not enabled. Split
> >>>> out the processor thermal cooling register from ACPI PSS to support
> >>>> this, and move it into a separate function in processor_thermal.c.
> >>>
> >>> It appears this commit 7fdc74da940d ACPI: processor: Split out thermal
> >>> initialization from ACPI PSS
> >>>
> >>> Is causing the following:
> >>> 41.341659] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >>> [ 41.346280] freq_qos_remove_request() called for unknown object
> >>> [ 41.352251] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1089 at kernel/power/qos.c:597
> >>> freq_qos_remove_request+0xa4/0xc4
> >>> [ 41.361152] Modules linked in: nf_nat_tftp nft_objref
> >>> nf_conntrack_tftp nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib
> >>> nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct
> >>> nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_set
> >>> nf_tables nfnetlink qrtr bnep sunrpc vfat fat btsdio brcmfmac hci_uart
> >>> btqca cfg80211 bs
> >>> [ 41.413245] CPU: 3 PID: 1089 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.0.0-rc1MINI+ #237
> >>> [ 41.419951] Hardware name: Raspberry Pi Foundation Raspberry Pi 4
> >>> Model B/Raspberry Pi 4 Model B, BIOS EDK2-DEV 07/18/2022
> >>> [ 41.430990] pstate: 40400005 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS
> >>> BTYPE=--)
> >>> [ 41.437955] pc : freq_qos_remove_request+0xa4/0xc4
> >>> [ 41.442752] lr : freq_qos_remove_request+0xa4/0xc4
> >>> [ 41.447550] sp : ffff80000a4bbb60
> >>> [ 41.450862] x29: ffff80000a4bbb60 x28: ffff07858798a1c0 x27:
> >>> 0000000000000000
> >>> [ 41.458012] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffffdf6ade80f850 x24:
> >>> ffff07858b07d200
> >>> [ 41.465158] x23: ffffdf6ade812cb0 x22: ffff07858b07d000 x21:
> >>> ffffdf6ade80f850
> >>> [ 41.472303] x20: ffffdf6ade26b998 x19: ffff0785809ba5a8 x18:
> >>> ffffffffffffffff
> >>> [ 41.479447] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffdf6adcc25320 x15:
> >>> 0000000000000006
> >>> [ 41.486592] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 7463656a626f206e x12:
> >>> 776f6e6b6e752072
> >>> [ 41.493736] x11: 00000000ffffdfff x10: ffffdf6ade8fd520 x9 :
> >>> ffffdf6adcae53ac
> >>> [ 41.500881] x8 : 000000000002ffe8 x7 : c0000000ffffdfff x6 :
> >>> 0000000000000001
> >>> [ 41.508026] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff07863b7ac450 x3 :
> >>> ffff07863b7b8bb0
> >>> [ 41.515170] x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : ffff281b5d54f000 x0 :
> >>> 0000000000000033
> >>> [ 41.522315] Call trace:
> >>> [ 41.524759] freq_qos_remove_request+0xa4/0xc4
> >>> [ 41.529210] acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit+0x90/0xb0
> >>> [ 41.533834] acpi_processor_notifier+0x74/0x90
> >>> [ 41.538281] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x78/0xb0
> >>> [ 41.543161] cpufreq_policy_free+0x154/0x1e0
> >>> [ 41.547438] cpufreq_remove_dev+0xc0/0x10c
> >>> [ 41.551538] subsys_interface_unregister+0xf0/0xfc
> >>> [ 41.556335] cpufreq_unregister_driver+0x54/0x120
> >>> [ 41.561043] cppc_cpufreq_exit+0x28/0xd2c [cppc_cpufreq]
> >>> [ 41.566370] __do_sys_delete_module.constprop.0+0x150/0x2bc
> >>> [ 41.571947] __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x20/0x30
> >>> [ 41.576567] invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120
> >>> [ 41.580318] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x4c/0xf4
> >>> [ 41.585023] do_el0_svc+0x38/0x4c
> >>> [ 41.588338] el0_svc+0x34/0xdc
> >>> [ 41.591394] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x11c/0x150
> >>> [ 41.595752] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194
> >>> [ 41.599416] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> >>>
> >>> When the cppc_cpufreq driver is rmmod'ed from a running machine that has
> >>> both CPPC and a thermal zone. I reverted and bisected it, and in both
> >>> cases the splat above goes away.
> >>
> >> Did you enable the option ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS ? When I reverted the commit
> >> 7fdc74da940d and enable ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS, the warning above also appears.
> >
> > AFAICS, this option is enabled automatically on all architectures
> > other than ARM64 when the ACPI processor driver is enabled, so I'm not
> > sure what you mean.
>
> I mean the commit 7fdc74da940d is not the real cause of the warning
> reported by Jeremy Linton. And Jeremy Linton‘s hardware is Raspberry Pi
> 4, arm platform.
OK
> I've debugged it in arm64 machine that has both CPPC and a thermal zone:
> If the processor thermal registered, and rmmod the cppc_cpufreq driver,
> the warning Jeremy Linton reported appears. Otherwise, there is no warning.
>
> I'll continue to debug why it cause warnings.
Cool, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists