linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: Fix reference imbalance in ti_find_clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YwS/j5ATAfCb1U4l@atomide.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 14:52:47 +0300
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Romain Naour <romain.naour@...le.fr>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: Fix reference imbalance in
 ti_find_clock_provider

* Romain Naour <romain.naour@...le.fr> [220823 09:22]:
> Hello,
> 
> Le 19/08/2022 à 23:23, Stephen Boyd a écrit :
> > Quoting Jan Kiszka (2022-08-08 15:26:58)
> >> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
> >>
> >> When a clock is found via clock-output-names, we need to reference it
> >> explicitly to match of_find_node_by_name behavior. Failing to do so
> >> causes warnings like this:
> >>
> > 
> > Is this superseeded by
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220621091118.33930-1-tony@atomide.com?
> 
> I noticed the same issue and tested separately with both patches.
> 
> Indeed, this patch is not needed anymore with "[PATCH] clk: ti: Fix missing
> of_node_get() ti_find_clock_provider()" applied.

OK good to hear and thanks for testing.

Regards,

Tony