linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] soundwire: bus: remove use of __func__ in dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220823050158.2671245-2-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 13:01:57 +0800
From:   Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
To:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc:     vinod.koul@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com,
        bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] soundwire: bus: remove use of __func__ in dev_dbg

From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>

The module and function information can be added with
'modprobe foo dyndbg=+pmf'

Suggested-by: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
index 8970f8560766..2772973eebb1 100644
--- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
@@ -827,13 +827,13 @@ static void sdw_modify_slave_status(struct sdw_slave *slave,
 	mutex_lock(&bus->bus_lock);
 
 	dev_vdbg(bus->dev,
-		 "%s: changing status slave %d status %d new status %d\n",
-		 __func__, slave->dev_num, slave->status, status);
+		 "changing status slave %d status %d new status %d\n",
+		 slave->dev_num, slave->status, status);
 
 	if (status == SDW_SLAVE_UNATTACHED) {
 		dev_dbg(&slave->dev,
-			"%s: initializing enumeration and init completion for Slave %d\n",
-			__func__, slave->dev_num);
+			"initializing enumeration and init completion for Slave %d\n",
+			slave->dev_num);
 
 		init_completion(&slave->enumeration_complete);
 		init_completion(&slave->initialization_complete);
@@ -841,8 +841,8 @@ static void sdw_modify_slave_status(struct sdw_slave *slave,
 	} else if ((status == SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED) &&
 		   (slave->status == SDW_SLAVE_UNATTACHED)) {
 		dev_dbg(&slave->dev,
-			"%s: signaling enumeration completion for Slave %d\n",
-			__func__, slave->dev_num);
+			"signaling enumeration completion for Slave %d\n",
+			slave->dev_num);
 
 		complete(&slave->enumeration_complete);
 	}
@@ -1849,8 +1849,8 @@ int sdw_handle_slave_status(struct sdw_bus *bus,
 				"Update Slave status failed:%d\n", ret);
 		if (attached_initializing) {
 			dev_dbg(&slave->dev,
-				"%s: signaling initialization completion for Slave %d\n",
-				__func__, slave->dev_num);
+				"signaling initialization completion for Slave %d\n",
+				slave->dev_num);
 
 			complete(&slave->initialization_complete);
 
-- 
2.25.1