lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WNNAYtdoocp_ShyNBOBmqSSr79=x_2UKq+yfA+HiOo9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:50:23 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Yongqin Liu <yongqin.liu@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
        Alistair Delva <alistair.delva@...aro.org>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>, Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] regulator: core: Allow specifying an initial load
 w/ the bulk API

Hi,

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:23 PM Yongqin Liu <yongqin.liu@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi, Douglas
>
> Just an update on the fix you pointed out previously here:
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220809142738.1.I91625242f137c707bb345c51c80c5ecee02eeff3@changeid
>
> With it I could boot the hikey960 build to the home screen if it does
> not use the GKI kernel.
> but the problem will be reproduced if it uses the GKI kernel.
>
> And if this change is reverted, then it could boot with the GKI kernel as well.
>
> I am not sure what's the reason there, but there seems to be some
> difference with the fix above and the workaround of revert.
> Not sure if you have any idea about that.
>
> Regarding the GKI kernel(Android Generic Kernel Image)[2], it's built
> from the android-mainline tree(f51334eac4de) without any workaround.
> (Neither the revert, nor the fix applied), and the regulator modules
> used for the hikey960 build are hi6421v530-regulator.ko and
> hi655x-regulator.ko
>
> I am still not sure if it would work with the GKI kernel that has the
> fix that you pointed out in. the case that both the GKI kernel and
> vendor tree have the fix.
> Will update here when I have some results.
>
> [2]: https://source.android.com/docs/core/architecture/kernel/generic-kernel-image?hl=en

That's not too surprising. The broken patch is in the core kernel so
you need the fix in the core kernel. I think that means you'll have to
wait until `android-mainline` gets the fix. I don't work on Android,
so if there's some other route to get an expedited fix into
android-mainline I'm not aware of it.

-Doug

-Doug

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ