[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwT6bmqeBeoYcRi7@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:03:58 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mchp-spdiftx: Fix clang
-Wbitfield-constant-conversion
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 08:39:13AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> I noticed that this was applied to for-6.1. I know you do not rebase or
> change your trees so this request might be rejected based on that alone
> but would it be possible to cherry-pick this to for-6.0 so that it can
> be applied to Linus's tree quicker? We have had to apply this change to
> our CI to keep our builds green in mainline, -tip, and 5.19/5.15 stable
> with clang-16 due to -Werror. If not, no worries, I should have made it
> clearer that is what I was looking for with the subject prefix.
Hrm, OK - it's a bit surprising that this didn't get fixed in -next
before the clang change made it to mainline TBH, it looked like
something that had just hit -next.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists