[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADxym3Z7WpPbX7VSZqVd+nVnbaO6HvxV7ak58TXBCqBqodU+Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:23:02 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, kuba@...nel.org,
miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com, ojeda@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
asml.silence@...il.com, imagedong@...cent.com,
luiz.von.dentz@...el.com, vasily.averin@...ux.dev,
jk@...econstruct.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
linux-toolchains <linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] net: skb: prevent the split of
kfree_skb_reason() by gcc
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 4:01 PM Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> * Menglong Dong:
>
> > /*
> > * Used by functions that use '__builtin_return_address'. These function
> > * don't want to be splited or made inline, which can make
> > * the '__builtin_return_address' got unexpected address.
> > */
> > #define __fix_address noinline __noclone
>
> You need something on the function *declaration* as well, to inhibit
> sibcalls.
>
I did some research on the 'sibcalls' you mentioned above. Feel like
It's a little similar to 'inline', and makes the callee use the same stack
frame with the caller, which obviously will influence the result of
'__builtin_return_address'.
Hmm......but I'm not able to find any attribute to disable this optimization.
Do you have any ideas?
Thanks!
Menglong Dong
> Thanks,
> Florian
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists