linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: dw: Add deferred controller registration support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 18:00:15 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc:     Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: dw: Add deferred controller registration support

On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 21:18:53 +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> It's pretty possible to have the spi_register_controller() method
> returning -EPROBE_DEFER status in case, for instance, if the GPIOs used
> for the CS implementation aren't ready to be requested due to the
> corresponding platform devices still pending to be probed. Let's make sure
> the DW SSI driver won't print error message in that case by calling the
> dev_err_probe() function if the SPI-registration procedure exited with
> a non-zero status.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: dw: Add deferred controller registration support
      commit: 52c135d495ca019abbacf063f5ef43bd5b189070

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark