linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] MPFS mailbox fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 18:46:10 +0000
From:   <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
CC:     <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <Daire.McNamara@...rochip.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] MPFS mailbox fixes

On 23/08/2022 19:44, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 1:42 PM <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/08/2022 13:56, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I spotted a couple of bugs in my mailbox driver while developing some
>>> new features. None of the features these bugs relate to were in use so
>>> they've gone unnoticed until now. The binding screwup is unfortunate
>>> and I don't really know how I misread the register map so badly.
>>>
>>> Jassi:
>>> Not sure if you prefer developers to add a CC: stable or not to patches
>>> so I have left them out, but I would like to see them backported.
>>
>> Hey Jassi,
>> Have you just not had a chance to look at this yet, or are you waiting
>> for me to resend with the extra fixes tag applied?
>>
> Please resend with fixes tags.

Cool, will do tomorrow.
Thanks for the prompt reply!
Conor.