lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df8f1406-e586-3e3c-987c-826b52702a3b@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:51:26 +0900
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
To:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com
Cc:     kyungmin.park@...sung.com, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
        jia-wei.chang@...iatek.com, johnson.wang@...iatek.com,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: mtk-cci: Handle sram regulator probe
 deferral

On 22. 7. 13. 20:15, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> If the regulator_get_optional()	call for the SRAM regulator returns
> a probe deferral, we must bail out and retry probing later: failing
> to do this will	produce	unstabilities on platforms requiring the
> handling for this regulator.
> 
> Fixes: b615b00c42da ("PM / devfreq: mediatek: Introduce MediaTek CCI devfreq driver")
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
> index 71abb3fbd042..e5458ada5197 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
> @@ -291,9 +291,13 @@ static int mtk_ccifreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	drv->sram_reg = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "sram");
> -	if (IS_ERR(drv->sram_reg))
> +	if (IS_ERR(drv->sram_reg)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(drv->sram_reg);
> +		if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +			goto out_free_resources;
> +
>  		drv->sram_reg = NULL;
> -	else {
> +	} else {
>  		ret = regulator_enable(drv->sram_reg);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			dev_err(dev, "failed to enable sram regulator\n");

Applied it. Thanks

-- 
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ