[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220823080120.059478611@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 09:59:06 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 045/365] apparmor: fix setting unconfined mode on a loaded profile
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
commit 3bbb7b2e9bbcd22e539e23034da753898fe3b4dc upstream.
When loading a profile that is set to unconfined mode, that label
flag is not set when it should be. Ensure it is set so that when
used in a label the unconfined check will be applied correctly.
Fixes: 038165070aa5 ("apparmor: allow setting any profile into the unconfined state")
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
@@ -746,16 +746,18 @@ static struct aa_profile *unpack_profile
profile->label.flags |= FLAG_HAT;
if (!unpack_u32(e, &tmp, NULL))
goto fail;
- if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_COMPLAIN || (e->version & FORCE_COMPLAIN_FLAG))
+ if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_COMPLAIN || (e->version & FORCE_COMPLAIN_FLAG)) {
profile->mode = APPARMOR_COMPLAIN;
- else if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_ENFORCE)
+ } else if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_ENFORCE) {
profile->mode = APPARMOR_ENFORCE;
- else if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_KILL)
+ } else if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_KILL) {
profile->mode = APPARMOR_KILL;
- else if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_UNCONFINED)
+ } else if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_UNCONFINED) {
profile->mode = APPARMOR_UNCONFINED;
- else
+ profile->label.flags |= FLAG_UNCONFINED;
+ } else {
goto fail;
+ }
if (!unpack_u32(e, &tmp, NULL))
goto fail;
if (tmp)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists