[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220823080126.246929890@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 10:01:33 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 192/365] netfilter: nf_ct_sane: remove pseudo skb linearization
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
commit a664375da76c6da8f83dc7997e43c568e1eb9a6a upstream.
For historical reason this code performs pseudo linearization of skbs
via skb_header_pointer and a global 64k buffer.
With arrival of BIG TCP, packets generated by TCP stack can exceed 64kb.
Rewrite this to only extract the needed header data. This also allows
to get rid of the locking.
Fixes: 7c4e983c4f3c ("net: allow gso_max_size to exceed 65536")
Fixes: 0fe79f28bfaf ("net: allow gro_max_size to exceed 65536")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sane.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sane.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sane.c
@@ -34,10 +34,6 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SANE connection tracking helper");
MODULE_ALIAS_NFCT_HELPER(HELPER_NAME);
-static char *sane_buffer;
-
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nf_sane_lock);
-
#define MAX_PORTS 8
static u_int16_t ports[MAX_PORTS];
static unsigned int ports_c;
@@ -67,14 +63,16 @@ static int help(struct sk_buff *skb,
unsigned int dataoff, datalen;
const struct tcphdr *th;
struct tcphdr _tcph;
- void *sb_ptr;
int ret = NF_ACCEPT;
int dir = CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo);
struct nf_ct_sane_master *ct_sane_info = nfct_help_data(ct);
struct nf_conntrack_expect *exp;
struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple;
- struct sane_request *req;
struct sane_reply_net_start *reply;
+ union {
+ struct sane_request req;
+ struct sane_reply_net_start repl;
+ } buf;
/* Until there's been traffic both ways, don't look in packets. */
if (ctinfo != IP_CT_ESTABLISHED &&
@@ -92,59 +90,62 @@ static int help(struct sk_buff *skb,
return NF_ACCEPT;
datalen = skb->len - dataoff;
-
- spin_lock_bh(&nf_sane_lock);
- sb_ptr = skb_header_pointer(skb, dataoff, datalen, sane_buffer);
- if (!sb_ptr) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&nf_sane_lock);
- return NF_ACCEPT;
- }
-
if (dir == IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL) {
+ const struct sane_request *req;
+
if (datalen != sizeof(struct sane_request))
- goto out;
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
+
+ req = skb_header_pointer(skb, dataoff, datalen, &buf.req);
+ if (!req)
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
- req = sb_ptr;
if (req->RPC_code != htonl(SANE_NET_START)) {
/* Not an interesting command */
- ct_sane_info->state = SANE_STATE_NORMAL;
- goto out;
+ WRITE_ONCE(ct_sane_info->state, SANE_STATE_NORMAL);
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
}
/* We're interested in the next reply */
- ct_sane_info->state = SANE_STATE_START_REQUESTED;
- goto out;
+ WRITE_ONCE(ct_sane_info->state, SANE_STATE_START_REQUESTED);
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
}
+ /* IP_CT_DIR_REPLY */
+
/* Is it a reply to an uninteresting command? */
- if (ct_sane_info->state != SANE_STATE_START_REQUESTED)
- goto out;
+ if (READ_ONCE(ct_sane_info->state) != SANE_STATE_START_REQUESTED)
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
/* It's a reply to SANE_NET_START. */
- ct_sane_info->state = SANE_STATE_NORMAL;
+ WRITE_ONCE(ct_sane_info->state, SANE_STATE_NORMAL);
if (datalen < sizeof(struct sane_reply_net_start)) {
pr_debug("NET_START reply too short\n");
- goto out;
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
}
- reply = sb_ptr;
+ datalen = sizeof(struct sane_reply_net_start);
+
+ reply = skb_header_pointer(skb, dataoff, datalen, &buf.repl);
+ if (!reply)
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
+
if (reply->status != htonl(SANE_STATUS_SUCCESS)) {
/* saned refused the command */
pr_debug("unsuccessful SANE_STATUS = %u\n",
ntohl(reply->status));
- goto out;
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
}
/* Invalid saned reply? Ignore it. */
if (reply->zero != 0)
- goto out;
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
exp = nf_ct_expect_alloc(ct);
if (exp == NULL) {
nf_ct_helper_log(skb, ct, "cannot alloc expectation");
- ret = NF_DROP;
- goto out;
+ return NF_DROP;
}
tuple = &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple;
@@ -162,9 +163,6 @@ static int help(struct sk_buff *skb,
}
nf_ct_expect_put(exp);
-
-out:
- spin_unlock_bh(&nf_sane_lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -178,7 +176,6 @@ static const struct nf_conntrack_expect_
static void __exit nf_conntrack_sane_fini(void)
{
nf_conntrack_helpers_unregister(sane, ports_c * 2);
- kfree(sane_buffer);
}
static int __init nf_conntrack_sane_init(void)
@@ -187,10 +184,6 @@ static int __init nf_conntrack_sane_init
NF_CT_HELPER_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct nf_ct_sane_master));
- sane_buffer = kmalloc(65536, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!sane_buffer)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
if (ports_c == 0)
ports[ports_c++] = SANE_PORT;
@@ -210,7 +203,6 @@ static int __init nf_conntrack_sane_init
ret = nf_conntrack_helpers_register(sane, ports_c * 2);
if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("failed to register helpers\n");
- kfree(sane_buffer);
return ret;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists