lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220823082748.td6pwkzj5grfno77@mobilestation>
Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 11:27:48 +0300
From:   Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Manish Narani <manish.narani@...inx.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Michail Ivanov <Michail.Ivanov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri 
        <punnaiah.choudary.kalluri@...inx.com>,
        Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/20] dt-bindings: memory: snps: Detach Zynq DDRC
 controller support

On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:22:08AM +0300, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/08/2022 11:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 22/08/2022 22:07, Serge Semin wrote:
> >> The Zynq A05 DDRC controller has nothing in common with DW uMCTL2 DDRC:
> >> the CSRs layout is absolutely different and it doesn't has IRQ unlike DW
> >> uMCTL2 DDR controller of all versions (v1.x, v2.x and v3.x). Thus there is
> >> no any reason to have these controllers described by the same bindings.
> >> Thus let's split them up.
> >>
> >> While at it rename the original Synopsys uMCTL2 DT-schema file to a more
> >> descriptive - snps,dw-umctl2-ddrc.yaml and add a more detailed title and
> >> description of the device bindings.
> > 
> > Filename should be based on compatible, so if renaming then
> > snps,ddrc-3.80a.yaml or snps,ddrc.yaml... which leads to original
> > filename anyway. Therefore nack for rename.
> > 
> > BTW, if you perform renames, generate patches with proper -M/-C/-B
> > arguments so this is detected.
> > 
> > 
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
> >> --->  .../snps,dw-umctl2-ddrc.yaml                  | 51 +++++++++++++
> > 
> > This is a mess. I did not get any cover letters, any other patches any
> > description of relation between this and your other one.
> > 
> > It seems you make independent and conflicting changes to the same file,
> > so this has to be properly organized.
> > 
> > Send entire patchset with cover letter with description of all
> > dependencies to all maintainers.
> > 
> > This is unreviewable now, so a no.
> 

> And also untestable by Rob's bot, so will have to wait.

For what reason it's untestable? The patch has no dependencies from
any other patchset.

-Sergey

> 
> I found the cover letters, somehow they got buried in inbox.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ