linux-kernel - Re: "Fixes:" vs. "Cc: stable ..."

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2022 13:11:51 -0500
From:   Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "Fixes:" vs. "Cc: stable ..."

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:58 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:14:12PM -0500, Steve French wrote:
> > Do changesets that already included the "Fixes:" tag in the commit
> > description also need to include the "Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org" in
> > order to be included in stable?
>
> As per the documentation:
>     https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
>
> You should be putting cc: stable@... on the patch.
>
> But as not all maintainers do, we have to dig through those with Fixes:
> in order to actually catch all bugfixes :(
>
> So please, use cc: stable.

Makes sense - I had noticed a patch which I was going to include in next P/R
which was missing this (fixed now).


-- 
Thanks,

Steve