| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4ad689b727f8aabd4c01f13d66223fb00aa06dd4.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 15:21:17 -0700
From: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: idxd: Set workqueue state to disabled before
trying to re-enable
On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 15:19 -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>
> On 8/24/2022 3:07 PM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 14:59 -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> > > On 8/24/2022 2:16 PM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 01:29:03PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> > > > > On 8/24/2022 12:29 PM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > > > > > For a software reset idxd_device_reinit() is called, which
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > walk
> > > > > > the device workqueues to see which ones were enabled, and
> > > > > > try
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > re-enable them. It keys off wq->state being
> > > > > > iDXD_WQ_ENABLED,
> > > > > > but the
> > > > > > first thing idxd_enable_wq() will do is see that the state
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > workqueue is enabled, and return 0 instead of attempting to
> > > > > > issue
> > > > > > a command to enable the workqueue.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So once a workqueue is found that needs to be re-enabled,
> > > > > > set the state to disabled prior to calling
> > > > > > idxd_enable_wq().
> > > > > > This would accurately reflect the state if the enable fails
> > > > > > as well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > > > > > Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
> > > > > > Fixes: bfe1d56091c1 ("dmaengine: idxd: Init and probe for
> > > > > > Intel
> > > > > > data accelerators")
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/dma/idxd/irq.c | 1 +
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/idxd/irq.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/dma/idxd/irq.c
> > > > > > index 743ead5ebc57..723eeb5328d6 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/dma/idxd/irq.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/dma/idxd/irq.c
> > > > > > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static void idxd_device_reinit(struct
> > > > > > work_struct *work)
> > > > > > struct idxd_wq *wq = idxd->wqs[i];
> > > > > > if (wq->state == IDXD_WQ_ENABLED) {
> > > > > > + wq->state = IDXD_WQ_DISABLED;
> > > > > Might be better off to insert this line in
> > > > > idxd_wq_disable_cleanup(). I
> > > > > think that should put it in sane state.
> > > > I don't think that is called in the code path that I was lookng
> > > > at.
> > > > I've been
> > > > looking at this bit of process_misc_interrupts():
> > > >
> > > > halt:
> > > > gensts.bits = ioread32(idxd->reg_base +
> > > > IDXD_GENSTATS_OFFSET);
> > > > if (gensts.state == IDXD_DEVICE_STATE_HALT) {
> > > > idxd->state = IDXD_DEV_HALTED;
> > > > if (gensts.reset_type ==
> > > > IDXD_DEVICE_RESET_SOFTWARE) {
> > > > /*
> > > > * If we need a software reset, we
> > > > will
> > > > throw the work
> > > > * on a system workqueue in order to
> > > > allow
> > > > interrupts
> > > > * for the device command completions.
> > > > */
> > > > INIT_WORK(&idxd->work,
> > > > idxd_device_reinit);
> > > > queue_work(idxd->wq, &idxd->work);
> > > > } else {
> > > > idxd->state = IDXD_DEV_HALTED;
> > > > idxd_wqs_quiesce(idxd);
> > > > idxd_wqs_unmap_portal(idxd);
> > > > spin_lock(&idxd->dev_lock);
> > > > idxd_device_clear_state(idxd);
> > > > dev_err(&idxd->pdev->dev,
> > > > "idxd halted, need %s.\n",
> > > > gensts.reset_type ==
> > > > IDXD_DEVICE_RESET_FLR ?
> > > > "FLR" : "system reset");
> > > > spin_unlock(&idxd->dev_lock);
> > > > return -ENXIO;
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > So it sees that the device is halted, and sticks
> > > > idxd_device_reinint() on that
> > > > workqueue. The idxd_device_reinit() has this loop to re-enable
> > > > the
> > > > idxd wqs:
> > > idxd_device_reinit() should called idxd_device_reset() first. And
> > > that
> > > should at some point call idxd_wq_disable_cleanup() and clean up
> > > the
> > > states.
> > >
> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.0-rc2/source/drivers/dma/idxd/irq.c#L42
> > >
> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.0-rc2/source/drivers/dma/idxd/device.c#L725
> > >
> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.0-rc2/source/drivers/dma/idxd/device.c#L711
> > >
> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.0-rc2/source/drivers/dma/idxd/device.c#L376
> > >
> > > So if we stick the wq state reset in there, it should show up as
> > > "disabled" by the time we try to enable the WQs again. Does that
> > > look
> > > reasonable?
> > >
> > Ah, yeah I see that now. So, if it does set the state to disabled
> > in
> > idxd_wq_disable_cleanup(), does it have another means to track
> > which
> > wqs need to be re-enabled for that loop that happens after the
> > idxd_device_reset() call?
>
> Oh I see what you mean... So we can either do what you did or create
> a
> mask and mark the WQ that are "enabled" before reset. Maybe that's
> cleaner rather than relying on the side effect of the WQ state isn't
> cleared? Thoughts?
>
That would be better I think.
>
> >
> > > > for (i = 0; i < idxd->max_wqs; i++) {
> > > > struct idxd_wq *wq = idxd->wqs[i];
> > > >
> > > > if (wq->state == IDXD_WQ_ENABLED) {
> > > > wq->state = IDXD_WQ_DISABLED;
> > > > rc = idxd_wq_enable(wq);
> > > > if (rc < 0) {
> > > > dev_warn(dev, "Unable to re-
> > > > enable
> > > > wq %s\n",
> > > >
> > > > dev_name(wq_confdev(wq)));
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Once you go into idxd_wq_enable() though you get this check at
> > > > the
> > > > beginning:
> > > >
> > > > if (wq->state == IDXD_WQ_ENABLED) {
> > > > dev_dbg(dev, "WQ %d already enabled\n", wq-
> > > > >id);
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > So IIUC it sees the device is halted, goes to reset it, figures
> > > > out
> > > > a wq
> > > > should be re-enabled, calls idxd_wq_enable() which hits the
> > > > check,
> > > > returns
> > > > 0 and the wq is never really re-enabled, though it will still
> > > > have
> > > > wq state
> > > > set to IDXD_WQ_ENABLED.
> > > >
> > > > Or am I missing something?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jerry
> > > >
> > > > > > rc = idxd_wq_enable(wq);
> > > > > > if (rc < 0) {
> > > > > > dev_warn(dev, "Unable to
> > > > > > re-
> > > > > > enable wq %s\n",
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists