[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f3bce7a-2b20-0760-5695-f103fbff0b1f@sberdevices.ru>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 03:48:13 +0000
From: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"haiyangz@...rosoft.com" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"sthemmin@...rosoft.com" <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>,
Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>,
"Krasnov Arseniy" <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>,
VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] vsock: updates for SO_RCVLOWAT handling
On 23.08.2022 23:57, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 16:30 -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 12:18:52PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:14:10 -0400 Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>> Stefano will be online again on Monday. I suggest we wait for him to
>>>> review this series. If it's urgent, please let me know and I'll take a
>>>> look.
Hi,
sure, nothing urgent, no problem. Let's wait for Stefano! Is there something
wrong with this patchset? I've replaced RFC -> net-next since Stefano reviewed
all patches except 0001 and suggested to use net-next in v4.
>>>
>>> It was already applied, sorry about that. But please continue with
>>> review as if it wasn't. We'll just revert based on Stefano's feedback
>>> as needed.
>>
>> Okay, no problem.
>
> For the records, I applied the series since it looked to me Arseniy
> addressed all the feedback from Stefano on the first patch (the only
> one still lacking an acked-by/reviewed-by tag) and I thought it would
> be better avoiding such delay.
Yes, only 0001 lacks reviewed-by
>
> We are still early in this net-next cycle, I think it can be improved
> incrementally as needed.
>
> Paolo
>
Thank You, Arseniy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists