[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwWg5g8sfw0r9ypH@hyeyoo>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:54:14 +0900
From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] mm/sl[au]b: cleanup
kmem_cache_alloc[_node]_trace()
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 05:04:36PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 8/17/22 12:18, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > This patch does:
>
> I've removed this line locally and re-idented the rest.
Ah, thanks. looks better.
> > - Despite its name, kmem_cache_alloc[_node]_trace() is hook for
> > inlined kmalloc. So rename it to kmalloc[_node]_trace().
> >
> > - Move its implementation to slab_common.c by using
> > __kmem_cache_alloc_node(), but keep CONFIG_TRACING=n varients to
> > save a function call when CONFIG_TRACING=n.
> >
> > - Use __assume_kmalloc_alignment for kmalloc[_node]_trace
> > instead of __assume_slab_alignement. Generally kmalloc has
> > larger alignment requirements.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> > Signed-off-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Thanks!
--
Thanks,
Hyeonggon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists