linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 0/7] i2c-imx-lpi2c: add IPG clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YwW7aROy3kSkumKQ@shikoro>
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:47:21 +0200
From:   "wsa@...nel.org" <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
        "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
        Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/7] i2c-imx-lpi2c: add IPG clock

Hi Krzysztof,

> Awesome! But you don't need my ack after such update. The ack or review
> is expected from maintainers and I am not the maintainer of IMX I2C
> driver or IMX platform/DTS.

Despite the fact that the ping was in deed too early, I think Peng Fan
has a point. If you suggest a change (Thanks a ton for that!), a quick
comment on the new version if the change reflects what you had in mind,
is fair, I'd say. Something like "Yeah, looks basically good, but the
maintainers have to check the details." I understand the "all too busy"
part, of course...

Thanks,

   Wolfram


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)