[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwW8eo1rbo9tmpVK@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:51:54 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Andrew Delgadilo <adelg@...gle.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, dylanbhatch@...gle.com,
sashalevin@...gle.com, gthelen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: Add a taint selftest
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 07:06:27AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 09:19:58PM +0000, Andrew Delgadilo wrote:
> > From: Andrew Delgadillo <adelg@...gle.com>
> >
> > When testing a kernel, one of the earliest signals one can get is if a
> > kernel has become tainted. For example, an organization might be
> > interested in mass testing commits on their hardware. An obvious first
> > step would be to make sure every commit boots, and a next step would be
> > to make sure there are no warnings/crashes/lockups, hence the utility of
> > a taint test.
>
> What's wrong with the tools/debugging/kernel-chktaint script?
>
> Why do we need another "get what the taint status is" program?
Ah, looks like that script should probably be changed to return an error
code if a taint is found, but that should be a simpler patch rather than
create a whole new script.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists