[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YwXAAtL8082my6dh@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 08:06:58 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19 000/365] 5.19.4-rc1 review
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 02:16:20PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 09:58:21AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.4 release.
> > There are 365 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:00:15 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Build results:
> total: 150 pass: 149 fail: 1
> Failed builds:
> um:defconfig
> Qemu test results:
> total: 489 pass: 489 fail: 0
>
> arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c:447:6: error: redefinition of 'apply_returns'
>
> I don't see the point of commit 89164a58fdc9 ("um: Add missing
> apply_returns()") because it results in two sets of apply_returns()
> functions.
Odd, the commit lied :)
I'll go delete this from 5.19.y, 5.15.y, and 5.10.y and push out a new
-rc2 for all of them.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists