linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: slince possible data races about pgdat->kswapd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f481a92a-faeb-e108-8538-647b9d3cb395@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2022 17:51:49 +0800
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
CC:     <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: slince possible data races about pgdat->kswapd


On 2022/8/24 16:24, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 24.08.22 09:19, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> The pgdat->kswapd could be accessed concurrently by kswapd_run() and
>> kcompactd(), it don't be protected by any lock, which could leads to
>> data races, adding READ/WRITE_ONCE() to slince it.
> Okay, I think this patch here makes it clearer that we really just want
> proper synchronization instead of hacking around it.
>
> What speaks against protecting pgdat->kswapd this using some proper
> locking primitive?

So add a new lock into struct pglist_data to protect pgdat->kswapd，other

option, thanks.

>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   mm/compaction.c | 4 +++-
>>   mm/vmscan.c     | 8 ++++----
>>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>> index 640fa76228dd..aa1cfe47f046 100644
>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>> @@ -1983,7 +1983,9 @@ static inline bool is_via_compact_memory(int order)
>>   
>>   static bool kswapd_is_running(pg_data_t *pgdat)
>>   {
>> -	return pgdat->kswapd && task_is_running(pgdat->kswapd);
>> +	struct task_struct *t = READ_ONCE(pgdat->kswapd);
>> +
>> +	return t && task_is_running(t);
>>   }
>>   
>>   /*
>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>> index 08c6497f76c3..65b19ca8c8ee 100644
>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> @@ -4644,7 +4644,7 @@ void kswapd_run(int nid)
>>   	pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
>>   	struct task_struct *t;
>>   
>> -	if (pgdat->kswapd)
>> +	if (READ_ONCE(pgdat->kswapd))
>>   		return;
>>   
>>   	t = kthread_run(kswapd, pgdat, "kswapd%d", nid);
>> @@ -4653,7 +4653,7 @@ void kswapd_run(int nid)
>>   		BUG_ON(system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING);
>>   		pr_err("Failed to start kswapd on node %d\n", nid);
>>   	} else {
>> -		pgdat->kswapd = t;
>> +		WRITE_ONCE(pgdat->kswapd, t);
>>   	}
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -4663,11 +4663,11 @@ void kswapd_run(int nid)
>>    */
>>   void kswapd_stop(int nid)
>>   {
>> -	struct task_struct *kswapd = NODE_DATA(nid)->kswapd;
>> +	struct task_struct *kswapd = READ_ONCE(NODE_DATA(nid)->kswapd);
>>   
>>   	if (kswapd) {
>>   		kthread_stop(kswapd);
>> -		NODE_DATA(nid)->kswapd = NULL;
>> +		WRITE_ONCE(NODE_DATA(nid)->kswapd, NULL);
>>   	}
>>   }
>>   
>