[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1Z2xR_Poiv4dTntpghWKES6Jk75jNiDy8q7_L8XfRyuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:09:56 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix build warnings in VDSO
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 5:35 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/vdso/vgetcpu.c b/arch/loongarch/vdso/vgetcpu.c
> index 43a0078e4418..e02e775f5360 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/vdso/vgetcpu.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/vdso/vgetcpu.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ static __always_inline const struct vdso_pcpu_data *get_pcpu_data(void)
> return (struct vdso_pcpu_data *)(get_vdso_base() - VDSO_DATA_SIZE);
> }
>
> +extern
> +int __vdso_getcpu(unsigned int *cpu, unsigned int *node, struct getcpu_cache *unused);
> int __vdso_getcpu(unsigned int *cpu, unsigned int *node, struct getcpu_cache *unused)
> {
I don't think that adding the declaration before the function is a
good workaround here,
that is likely to just trigger another warning about declarations in .c files.
I would add the declarations into a header file instead. If the
prototypes are the same
across architectures, this can be a global header that also avoids the
warnings elsewhere,
otherwise just keep it local to this directory.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists