linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] sched/psi: per-cgroup PSI accounting disable/re-enable interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2207ff74-a5ca-8324-0e10-717f235ca161@bytedance.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:55:01 +0800
From:   Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:     tj@...nel.org, mkoutny@...e.com, surenb@...gle.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, songmuchun@...edance.com,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] sched/psi: per-cgroup PSI accounting
 disable/re-enable interface

On 2022/8/24 17:59, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Hi Chengming,
> 
> Thanks for incorporating all the feedback. I have a few nitpicks
> below, but with those considered, please add:
> 
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> 
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 04:18:29PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
>> @@ -5171,12 +5220,19 @@ static struct cftype cgroup_base_files[] = {
>>  	{
>>  		.name = "irq.pressure",
>>  		.flags = CFTYPE_PRESSURE,
>> +		.file_offset = offsetof(struct cgroup, psi_files[PSI_IRQ]),
>>  		.seq_show = cgroup_irq_pressure_show,
>>  		.write = cgroup_irq_pressure_write,
>>  		.poll = cgroup_pressure_poll,
>>  		.release = cgroup_pressure_release,
>>  	},
>>  #endif
>> +	{
>> +		.name = "cgroup.pressure",
>> +		.flags = CFTYPE_PRESSURE,
>> +		.seq_show = cgroup_psi_show,
>> +		.write = cgroup_psi_write,
> 
> To match the naming convention, these should be called
> cgroup_pressure_show() and cgroup_pressure_write().

Hello,

I forgot to change the names, will do.

> 
>> @@ -745,6 +745,14 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
>>  		if (set & (1 << t))
>>  			groupc->tasks[t]++;
>>  
>> +	if (!group->enabled) {
>> +		if (groupc->state_mask & (1 << PSI_NONIDLE))
>> +			record_times(groupc, now);
> 
> Thanks for the explanation in the other thread, it made sense. But can
> you please add a comment to document it? Something like:
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * On the first group change after disabling PSI, conclude
> 	 * the current state and flush its time. This is unlikely
> 	 * to matter to the user, but aggregation (get_recent_times)
> 	 * may have already incorporated the live state into times_prev;
> 	 * avoid a delta sample underflow when PSI is later re-enabled.
> 	 */
> 
> An unlikely() would also make sense on that branch.

The comment is very helpful, unlikely() is also very good point,
will add in the next version.

> 
>> @@ -1081,6 +1092,40 @@ void cgroup_move_task(struct task_struct *task, struct css_set *to)
>>  
>>  	task_rq_unlock(rq, task, &rf);
>>  }
>> +
>> +void psi_cgroup_enabled_sync(struct psi_group *group)
>> +{
>> +	int cpu;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * After we disable psi_group->enabled, we don't actually
>> +	 * stop percpu tasks accounting in each psi_group_cpu,
>> +	 * instead only stop test_state() loop, record_times()
>> +	 * and averaging worker, see psi_group_change() for details.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * When disable cgroup PSI, this function has nothing to sync
>> +	 * since cgroup pressure files are hidden and percpu psi_group_cpu
>> +	 * would see !psi_group->enabled and only do task accounting.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * When re-enable cgroup PSI, this function use psi_group_change()
>> +	 * to get correct state mask from test_state() loop on tasks[],
>> +	 * and restart groupc->state_start from now, use .clear = .set = 0
>> +	 * here since no task status really changed.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!group->enabled)
>> +		return;
> 
> Thanks for adding the comment, that's helpful.
> 
> I think the function would be a tad clearer and self-documenting if
> you called it psi_cgroup_restart(), and only call it on enabling.

Ok, it's better, will do.

Thanks for your review!

> 
>> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> +		struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
>> +		struct rq_flags rf;
>> +		u64 now;
>> +
>> +		rq_lock_irq(rq, &rf);
>> +		now = cpu_clock(cpu);
>> +		psi_group_change(group, cpu, 0, 0, now, true);
>> +		rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf);
>> +	}
>> +}
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUPS */
> 
> Thanks,
> Johannes