linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.19 000/362] 5.19.4-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220824110629.GA852409@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2022 04:06:29 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19 000/362] 5.19.4-rc2 review

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 03:53:55AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 09:01:14AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.4 release.
> > There are 362 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 26 Aug 2022 06:58:34 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Now I get this build error:
> 
> Building s390:allmodconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> In file included from include/linux/string.h:253,
>                  from include/linux/bitmap.h:11,
>                  from include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
>                  from include/linux/smp.h:13,
>                  from include/linux/lockdep.h:14,
>                  from include/linux/spinlock.h:62,
>                  from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
>                  from include/linux/gfp.h:6,
>                  from include/linux/slab.h:15,
>                  from kernel/fork.c:16:
> In function 'fortify_memcpy_chk',
>     inlined from 'copy_signal' at kernel/fork.c:1716:2:
> include/linux/fortify-string.h:344:25: error: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with attribute warning: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror=attribute-warning]
>   344 |                         __write_overflow_field(p_size_field, size);
> 
> This is with gcc 11.3.0.
> 
The above error is spurious and not new, so not of immediate concern.

Guenter